A settlement being discussed in an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA and major college conferences could cost billions and pave the way for a compensation model for college athletes.
An agreement has not been finalized and many questions remain unanswered. It is also unclear if new rules could withstand further legal scrutiny, but it appears college sports is heading down a revolutionary path with at least some schools directly paying athletes to participate. Here’s what is known and what still needs to be figured out:
House vs. NCAA is a class-action federal lawsuit seeking damages for athletes who were denied the opportunity to earn money from use of their name, image or likeness going back to 2016. The plaintiffs, including former Arizona State swimmer Grant House, are also asking the court to rule that NIL compensation should include billions of dollars in media rights fees that go to the NCAA and the wealthiest conferences (Big Ten, Big 12, Atlantic Coast and Southeastern), mostly for football and basketball.
Related articles:
Related suggestion:
A new Washington state law does not offer cash for reporting hate speechA Danish hippie oasis has fought drug sales for years. Now, locals want to tear up the whole streetNew strategy to attack aggressive brain cancer shows promiseHong Kong jails Portuguese national for overseas social media posts — Radio Free AsiaBetter conditions fail to yield signs of missing crew member from fishing boatIn many African countries, abortions are legal. But information and access can be hard to come byMaple syrup from New Jersey: You got a problem with that?$1.50 for a coffee? The viral street ‘cafe’ run by a homeless manNZ Foreign Minister urges Israel not to begin Rafah ground offensiveMore than six in 10 US abortions in 2023 were done by medication
2.9032s , 6501.2578125 kb
Copyright © 2024 Powered by Paying college athletes appears closer than ever. How could it work and what stands in the way? ,Global Glossary news portal